Evaluation - Michael McGroarty

1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

For our short film, we chose a crossover of the following 2 genres:-
• Social realism (in this case, a drama)
• Post-apocalyptic

The first thing to mention here is the influence of British directors. My own influences strayed beyond British directors, but that will come later. The directors who have influenced me are as follows:-
• Andrea Arnold
• Mike Leigh
• David Lean
• Danny Boyle

The first director I will talk about is David Lean, pictured right. Here is a link to his biography, http://www.bfi.org.uk/lean/intro.php?isec=biography. I have taken it from the British Film Institutes website. David Lean is one of Britain’s most important directors, and Brief Encounter, a romantic drama set during war-time is especially brilliant. Directors should break or challenge social rhythms, social classes and the social mind state. Lean created a controversial piece with Brief Encounter because of:-
• Laura Jesson (Celia Johnson) is tempted to cheat on her husband with a doctor, Alec Harvey (Trevor Howard).
• The way the situation is depicted, the audience feel like this is a good thing.

This link, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hubyFqSUaGA, is of the last scene of the film. It is here that the audience feel a strong emotional reaction as Laura and Alec part ways, forever. The scene is bittersweet; we feel sad for their break-up, but relieved that she didn’t cheat on her husband. Lean was very much ahead of his time, showing the nature of temptation and the deceit that it brings. The way the nature of love is depicted is partnered with the moral and social conscience of Laura, as she grapples with her own ethics. Concerning these themes, Lean influenced me in the following ways:-
• That challenging social forms can be done through a simple story.
• That social ethics change with the times, but can be accentuated during certain periods. For example current day Britain is a lot more open concerning sex and marriage than during WWII.
• That the characters must remain sympathetic and relatable, even when there moral compass is off.

While I couldn’t emulate the technical prowess or artistry Lean creates in his films, the conventions of the socially realistic film he portrayed in Brief Encounter was invaluable.

The next director I’d like to talk about is Danny Boyle (pictured right). Danny Boyle is a strange director. He is very much like Stanley Kubrick in that he is a genre hopper. Below is a list of some of his films and their genres:-
• 28 Days Later – Horror/Thriller
• Trainspotting – Social Realism/Drama
• Millions – Comedy/Drama
• The Beach – Adventure/Thriller
• A Life Less Ordinary – Fantasy/Romance

I have chosen these 5 films because they vary so much. Trainspotting and 28 Days Later are both socially realistic films, with the latter incorporating the horror theme, whereas Millions and A Life Less Ordinary are charming fantasies. The Beach was his first film abroad, and it’s like nothing else of his film projects.

Here are a couple of clips from his films I feel are relevant concerning my own piece:-

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBZnuUZIbBQ – the reason I have chosen this is only for the opening 30 seconds or so. Even though it is set post-infection, meaning there are no people around, his setting and character are still relatable. The use of Big Ben and the distinctive red buses allows the audience in, and making the character an ordinary man in an extraordinary situation in a recognizable setting doesn’t alienate or subdue the audience into thinking it’ll be just another brainless zombie flick with tons of blood and no humanity. This is also relevant because it concentrates on the aftermath of an unknown disaster. While the audience know what has happened, the main character does not, a feature we used for our own project.
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koP4O6QAzx4 – This is the opening to Trainspotting, another social realist film. It is immediate that it is an unglamorous film. The costumes, setting and voiceover all illustrate a decaying landscape. The streets on which Renton runs are immediately recognisable; they could be from any town in Britain. The 5 aside football match is massively recognisable; football is the nation’s favourite sport and the 5 aside leisure is one of more popular forms of football.

Concerning his inspiration on myself with regards to our piece, he merely tinted our project as oppose to influencing it. Within 2 minutes he created 5 relatable characters, characters similar to people we probably know. Now as we were making a short film, we also established our characters in a few minutes, so in a way, Danny Boyle influenced me to make sure we get as much of the character into the piece so it is relatable.

Mike Leigh and Andrea Arnold (both pictured right) were only minorly significant to our project. Happy-Go-Lucky was a very interesting film in it’s depiction of classes and attitudes in modern Britain, especially where Scott (Eddie Marsan) is concerned. He is a weirdly relatable character. He has an ordinary life, an ordinary job, yet his views on the world around him are extreme. However, he is shown in such a way that we do not feel alienated or disgusted by him, but we sympathise for him. Here is a clip illustrating my point, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN_kOED6zGE. At 5:30, when two young black men cycle past the car he tells Poppy to lock her door. It is his view that all blacks are dangerous people and should not be trusted, an extreme view to hold in the modern world. In this way, we also had the challenge of creating relatable characters by:-
• Having recognisable traits of everyday people.
• Have them created through costume and looks that they are normal people.
• Constructing relatable actions and words through dialogue and body language.

I felt this was an important aspect of social realism; relatability. The characters need to be understood and valued by the audience, so in this way, Mike Leigh inspired me. Andrea Arnold has directed some notable films, which can be read up on here, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0036349/. After viewing Wasp and a little of Fish Tank, it was clear that Arnold had an eye for sympathetic character construction. Even though the mum from Wasp isn’t exactly a ‘good’ mother, she has redeeming qualities in her. In this way, she inspired me to create imperfect characters. In this way, socially realistic characters are relatable.

Moving onto foreign films, and I’m incorporating global cinema into this category.

25th Hour is a post-9/11 drama. On the left is a shot sequence of one of the characters in gradually expanding shot lengths. I liked this little sequence because it first emphasises his facial expression, then his body language, so the characters demeanour is visible in each shot, but is developed in each shot. I decided to incorporate this into my storyboard, but with a tower of baked bean cans to have the same effect.





Below are 2 shots. The uppermost one is from Elia Kazan’s 1955 film East of Eden. In the shot James Dean is leaning on a wall unit with angst. A similar shot can be found in Werner Herzog’s drama, Woyzeck, with Klaus Kinski. Both of the characters are in the foreground, and the characters consoling/aggravating are in the background. In this way, they are emphasised emotionally and physically. I used a similar shot in my piece with one character being consoled in the foreground by a character in the background. In this way the accentuated characters emotions are brought to light through the others words.





Although our lighting was underdeveloped, I did research lighting through watching various genres of films. Andrei Tarkovsky’s 1979 film Stalker uses a black and white/sepia tone to create a bleak and nightmarish feel to the film. Characters emotions are heightened by the lighting schematic, without its stylised tone being too deliberate. I couldn’t emulate the lighting from the film, but it did give me something to aspire to. The 2 images on the right show that the artistic lighting is superior compared to the social realist films I’ve mentioned previously, but social realism doesn’t call for dazzling visuals.






His shots of the outdoors are especially brilliant. The 2 shots on the right distill his ‘poetry-in-motion’ visuals that he is famous for. The shots below were inspirational simply for their beauty. Tarkovsky is notable because all of his shots were crafted artistically, rather than practically.




Concerning typical narrative structure, representation, mise en scene, sound, editing, camera work and themes and issues, our film worked with some of these conventions.

Our film stuck to and broke British social realism conventions in the following ways:-

• Representations of male characters – deconstruction. Although the male nature is being broken and explored more now than ever, it is still an underplayed part of many social-realist pieces. Our film deconstructs the male identity; the characters are not hard as nails or granite faced, they are emotionally and physically as volatile as women. In this way we challenged the male psyche.
• With the technical aspects, camera work, sound and editing, we were pretty rigid with our parameters. There were no cuts besides the straight cut. Our camera work was stable and formulaic, and our sound was slightly off kilter due to the hum of the fridge in the background.
• Themes and issues brought up in British cinema include; social classes and their different attitudes, different views between women and men concerning mental and physical structure.

2. How effective is the combination of your main product and your ancillary tasks?


Concerning our main product, the film, with our ancillary tasks, the poster and review, I think all three marry up quite harmoniously. Our poster (pictured) and review (pictured) both reflect the themes of the film. The posters darkness and emptiness fits the depressing nature of the film. With the conventions of British social realism posters, we understood the basic conventions, but didn't opt to use them. We broke common conventions by not using recognizable backgrounds or character types. In fact the poster gives very little away about the films characters. With our review, it had to done in the house style of Little White Lies, so breaking conventions there was imposible because the brief didn't allow it. Here are the conventions we stuck to in the review:-

-Having a single image at the top of the review
-Having the review in 4 columns (although not all reviews are laid out in this way)
-Using complex, film literate language to appeal to LWL target audience
-Having the background as a solid base colour, in our case, white
-Having the films title, release date, stars and directors in different boxes in a particular place on the review
-Using the 3 tier evaluation system at the end of the review to sum up our thoughts and feelings on the piece
-Making references to other films and current affairs

I felt we stuck to these conventions well. Here are some examples from LWL itself. I feel we emulated their style and craft quite successfully. As a unit, I feel our film should be reflected through the words in the review and the visuals in the poster. I think the nature of the film is reflected through the poster somewhat, and its ideological and socio-realistic commentary are present in the review.

3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?

I decided to take a personal approach with the film as people can be too polite over the Internet. Several people who do media in other schools watched my piece. I chose media students because they know how to spot the strengths and weaknesses and solutions for the next project. Below is the feedback from people. I quote them. Their names are alongside their opinion.

-Nick Weatherby - 'The lighting was changing throughout and it didn't work very well with the rest of the film' - 'The dialogue was good, but it didn't lead the story anywhere'

-Chris Vaughan - 'The lighting was not done very well, some of it is too dark to see the facial expressions or anything' - 'I think it could have used some music over the top, like a piano or something, in a sad tone'

-Holly Emery - 'It was dramatic in places, but the lighting just wasn't happening' - The acting was good, but the story was too short, not enough oomph'

-Kevin Moulton - 'Good job, but the lighting really let it down' - 'The story had a focus, but nowhere to go'

-Joe Gordon - 'It was alright, but it drifted too much' - 'Could've used some humour to make the characters seem more realistic'

Our feedback was interesting. Obviously the main thing was lighting. I agree with tehm all. The lighting was poor, and some of the shots are barely visible. Now next time I shoot, I will make sure the lighting is present in each shot. While our location wasn't exactly roomy, it did enable us to light from 1 location, but we didn't exploit it well enough. Lighting is an oft overlooked part of filmmaking to amateurs, so next time I will pay strict attention to it.

Another bone of contention was the lack of depth with the story. Some of them felt it went nowhere. While this is correct, I think this was partly intentional on our part, but magnified by a neutral and critical viewpoint from others. Our sotry didn't really follow the normal 3 stage narrative of films. There was a set up, but no kind of disequilibrium and no resolution, so a film literate audience I got feedback from noticed this. Perhaps next time investing in a proper ending and some kind of disequilibrium would enhance the viewing experience for the audience.

My last point is a mix of music and humour. We felt that having music over the top would ruin the piece, but it seemed to be an underlying trait in most comments. A soft piano would've enhanced the drama, so maybe next time investing some time into putting a good piece of music over the top would increase the drama and hence the overall wellbeing of the film. Joe Gordon made an interesting point when he said the characters should have had more humour; a typical British trait. Even in the face of depression, our humour lives on. This is most potent in films like 'Looking For Eric' or 'Happy-Go Lucky', where humour is contrasted by the dank and realistic tone of the film. Our British humour is never forgotten in the social realism films, so theres something quite big there we overlooked.

4. How did you use new media technologies in the construction, and research, planning and evaluation stages?
‘New media technologies’ includes the digital cameras used, apple mac editing software (i movie or final cut pro), garageband, blogging, social networking sites (if used), indesign, photoshop.

I used a variety of different types of software. Such as:-

-Final Cut Pro
-GarageBand
-XM2 Video Camera
-Blogger
-YouTube
-InDesign
-Photoshop

The XM2 is a terrific piece of camera equipment. It is a high quality camera, and is quite a bit larger than regular digital cameras. Here is a picture. It was easy to use, the functions were all easy to find through the on'screen menus, and the recordings were quite clean.



Final Cut Pro is a sophisticated piece of software. I used this instead of iMovie because of its complexity and range of tools. iMovie was too basic, and I found Final Cut a lot easier to use. Editing the footage was a simple process, and the transitions were easy to apply. Here is a video of the basic tools of Final Cut Pro. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVQaP1Kc8NA The cutting tool was clen and efficient, and the layout was good. It enabled easy transition between editing at the beginning to the end of the film. Considering our uploaded footage came in one 31 minute segment, this proved invaluable.

Blogger was essential. It enabled us to post our thoughts on filming, general progression and ideas for the main and ancillary tasks. Blogger has an easy to navigate format, and the layout is agreeable. You can post as many entries as you like, and you can insert hyperlinks, pictures and video, so the blog is multimedia, something that helped our criteria for this project.

InDesign and Photoshop are quite similar pieces of software. Tom used photoshop for the poster while I used InDesign for the review. I found InDesign had more options and was easier to naviagte and find tools. Here is a screenshot of photoshop in action. Here is a tutorial of InDesign. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hPni_N3jtQ It ciovers the use of feathering, something I had to use myself. You can get a general feel for InDesign from the tutorial.



I didn't actually use GarageBand that is in the finished product, but I did explore some possibilities in the software. The use of sound effects and stark music was interesting, but ultimately nothing came from it. Here is a screen grab from GarageBand.

Evaluation - Thomas Brown

1. When we first began to work upon our film, we decided that we wanted to develop a social realism style film. We also decided fairly quickly that we wanted to make use of the Cellar below my house, which was a very promising location. We decided to create Social realism / Post apoclyptic film, And that instead of tackling what was outside, we wanted to explore the feelings that the characters would have. We felt that this was an interesting choice as a large amount of these films tackle whats outside directly, Whilst our film doesnt directly show you what the threat is. we drew largely from films such as the Road ( John Hillcoat ) which are focused around a few characters struggling against a large threat ( Also see 28 days Later). We felt this would help with character relation, as you get to know each character more. On the social realism level of things, we wanted to keep things realistic. Some films set post crisis have the characters gunning down hordes of zombies, and whilst this can make for very interesting film, we decided it was not a path we could realistically go down. Social realist movies can end in a huge variety of ways due to the amount of sub-genre's attached to them. We decided it was best to leave our ending more open, the hinting at a rescue, However you do not know if this was recieved, Or wheh the message went out. he fate of the father is also left open. We felt this would allow people to make their own decision, Which often makes for a more enjoyable experience.

Key things we wanted to include in our Short film from the Post apocolyptic Drama :

• Low Key Lighting - We Felt this would add to the suspense, as well as fit the scene, as there is no electricity in the area at the time of the apocolypse.
• An Unknown terror - Although not a horror film, the idea behind this was to play on peoples personal fears, because the viewer is no directly shown the enemy, then the viewer is allowed to imagine, which can add a lot of suspense.

Here Is a link to our video showing our low key lighting, Due to their being little natural light in the cellar, we had to artificially light 100 % of it, This turned out to be a very difficult and frustrating decision. We had to reshoot 3 times to finally get the lighting right, And even with the third shoot i feel it should of been lighter. In terms of conventions i feel we have met the criteria, Although their are issues with lighting we have achieved low key ( If very low key! ) Lighting, And the suspense is their. However if i were to Redo a simaler film, I would rewrite the script to include more exploration, If only of the cellar, The location has a lot of potential and the script could of been extended to be more dramatic.

We aimed to keep all sound Diagetic, So that it kept to the realistic aim of our film. The voiceover Is supposed to be as if heard over a radio, so although offscreen can be heard by the characters.
2.

For the Ancillary Tasks, Me and michael split the load into two, Taking a 75 / 25 % Share, I took main control over the poster, With michael on the Review.


The poster was designed around a single image, Which i wanted to surround with Darkness, To emphasise the Lonely aspect of the film. I then Added text into the black areas so it did not Overlap the image. This was important as it made the image the centerpiece of the poster. I feel that the poster actually represents the film quite well, It is striking with a lone image in the middle, and although Dark, Catches the eye quite well with the Strong image in the middle. We chose to use a Single award, As to much on the page would Take from the image to much, Simalerly, we tried to keep the Text to a minimum, With the only large font being the title. One of the main flaws with the poster is the Certificate. The Font does not match the rest and the 15 is not clear, and could easily be mistaken for an 18. This could hurt the potential audience, as the 15 - 18 year old bracket makes up a large amount of cinema goers. Criticism from Our target audience Showed that they felt the bottom of the poster let it down, With it being difficult to read and the Certificate and Studio block not Being level.

The review is my personal favourite of the productions. I feel it fit the task of recreating the LWlies review well. The language used was overall very appropriate. However i do feel we were slightly Generous with review scores, which could leave consumers expecting more from the film.

3. We Recieved varied feedback from people. The Difficulty with getting people to give feedback is that people generally dont want to be to honest in order to not offend. After asking around we got varied response. Some people praised some elements of the film, Mainly stuff such as the setting and some of the framing. however there was a lot of people saying that the middle segment of the film was lit very different to the beginning, which was something we also picked up upon. These comments have convinced me thy clear, this is something we predicted people would comment on, as we were worried about this upon finishing our film. in the future we should make sure to check that lighting is very consitent, as it can really spoil the illusion that is film. Some people were also very confused by the plot, as some of it wasnt verm that we have never used before.


4. We used a large amount of technology whilst producing this film, All of this technology allowed us to create the film as it is, and without it the task would not have been possible.

I will start by mentioning the XM2. When we first shot our film, The footage was unwatchable, It was to dark and the general purpose camera we were using wasnt picking up enough of the light. This ment we needed something which would perform this purpose. The XM2 ( Link to techspecs here ) Allowed us to capture much higher quality images and sound. This ment that filming in low key lighting was easier. It is also much easier to hold steady, so for what handheld shots we had to do, We were more confident about them.We tried a variety of lighting whilst filming our footage. On the final shoot we used Redheads, As these allowed us to get more directed light, As well as to light from different angles due to their being multiple lights. This allowed us to create more realistic natural light. you are also able to Attack Gels and diffusers, to further manipulate the light. We used this to our advantage, And managed to create convincing light. However we did not use these to their full advantage, Due to the lighting being changed part way through the shoot. This ment the film has incosistent lighting, which was one of the main complaints about the film.

One of the main pieces of technology we have gotten used to using is Final Cut Pro. We were originally going to use Imovie, The built in apple software, However it does not allow the customisation that Finalcut Provides. Final cut allows you to use more fonts for titling, And offers much more option for Shot changes and visual effects. We used this software to lighten the shots slightly as well, So that they were more clear. without this the shots would have definately been to dark. The fonts also allowed us to create more dynamic titling which could not have been done in Imovie. It also allows you to edit clips before you add them to the movie, This allows you to make sure a clip is going to work before you add it, meaning you have more control over the clip, as once its in it can be difficult to change the segment of film without disturbing other shots

We Made extensive use of Photoshop as well, For the Review and poster picture. I removed a lot of the background of the image, And darkened it to emphasise the face and the candle.I also resized the image & made use of the clone tool.

The main tool used to create the poster was InDesign. This allowed us to arrange all of the different Images & fonts that went into the Poster on different layers. Although this can be done in photoshop, Photoshop is more image based. Indesign offers much higher customisation on fonts, So we used photoshop to edit the pictures and then Arranged them in Indesign.

However we did have some trouble with technology. Since we had not used Final Cut before, It took us several days to become efficient in using it, this ment that we were unable to use our time effectively. Photoshop also consistently locked up and crashed, leaving us with our unsaved work staring at us, unable to use.

LWL Finished Review - Michael McGroarty

This is the finished review in the LWL format.

Posted by Michael McGroarty

Final poster ( officially this time!)

Draft review artistic choices - Michael McGroarty

As LWL is a very artistic and styled magazine, it is important to mirror this aspect in our own review.

Work in progress.

Michael McGroarty

Review Layout choices and discussion - Michael McGroarty

The uppermost image is Tom's layout draft. The one at the bottom is mine. Collectively, we have decided that Tom's is the better layout. We felt that it was more in keeping with the LWL stylistic layout. Mine was taken from a plainer review, so the layout construct doesn't reflect as aptly the unique LWL design layout. Also Tom's has the inclusion of the doodle on it, which is an important aspect of LWL. Also, he has deconstructed the review into sections; background, film, evaluation and the 3 point system. He has kept the scoring system in a separate box from the rest of the review, an important but easily overlooked part of a typical LWL review. We have decided on a single page review; our film is only 4 minutes or so, so making a double page review is both impractical and nonsensical. As such, I may have to drop the word count slightly if we want the layout to fit into the boxes. That is why the above images show only a single side. Now we have decided on a layout for our review and I have some feedback on my draft review, I can edit the review accordingly, and begin the artistic work concerning the page review itself. I will post up a basic construct of the review soon, and I will have the completed article done by the deadline on Thursday. Now the film is fully edited and on the blog, and the film poster is finalised, this is the only task we have left to do.

Posted by Michael McGroarty

Our short film - Lock In - Michael McGroarty

Here is the upload of our film, Lock In. This is where we will post general audience feedback. My own initial criticisms of the film is that it's a little short with the run time, and that in some shots the lighting is just about acceptable. Also, the sound levels change a couple of times, which upsets the flow of the film slightly. The camera is sometimes shaky, but nothing that ruins the aesthetic of the film. The strengths of the films is that it's got some good framing, and a suitably wide array of shots, considering the limited space of the location. The continuity is solid; no glaring errors, and the match-on-action that we have created works well. There is a distinct lack of music, but I feel this complements the film, although others may feel differently. I will post the video on Facebook, and get some suitable feedback. This way our evaluation will have a lot more substance.

Posted by Michael McGroarty